<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Snohomish County DUI Defense Advocate &#187; false arrest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defenseadvocate.com/tag/false-arrest/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defenseadvocate.com</link>
	<description>Exploring Current DUI and Related Criminal Law Issues in Snohomish County, Washington State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Speeding, riding the fog line, odor of alcohol and &#8220;DUI eyes&#8221; do not add up to probable cause to arrest.</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseadvocate.com/speeding-riding-the-fog-line-odor-of-alcohol-and-dui-eyes-do-not-add-up-to-probable-cause-to-arrest</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseadvocate.com/speeding-riding-the-fog-line-odor-of-alcohol-and-dui-eyes-do-not-add-up-to-probable-cause-to-arrest#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Lawrence, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everett DUI Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mill Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bothell DUI Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunk Driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dui arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mill Creek DUI Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probable cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseadvocate.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The probable cause needed to conduct a DUI arrest requires that the officer have knowledge or reasoanably trustworthy information that the suspect was actaully in physical control of a moving vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, to a degree which renders him incapable of driving safely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Georgia Court of Appeals comes a helpful case for Washington DUI attroneys on what amounts to probable cause to arrest for DUI.  In State v. Encinas, 2010 WL 481357, the officer stopped Mr. Encinas for going 70 M.P.H. in a 55 M.P.H. zone and &#8220;riding against the fog line.&#8221;  Upon approaching the vehicle the officer noticed that Encinas had bloodshot, glassy eyes and the he smelled of alcohol.  When asked how much he had to drink Mr. Encinas replied the he had not been drinking.  He had dropped somone off who had been drinking and that is why the vehicle smelled of alcohol. </p>
<p>Encinas was asked to exit the vehicle.  The officer noted an odor of alcohol coming from the suspects breath.  He perfrormed the HGN test and observed 4 of 6 clues (indicating the driver had likely consumed alcohol).  Encinas declined any further roadside tests and elected not to take a breath alcohol test.</p>
<p>Officers also testified that Encinas did not fumble for his wallet or seem disoriented.  He was steady on his feet and did not have slurred speech.  Playing of the video of the arrest showed that the officer had not properly performed the HGN and thus could not be used to determine PC to arrest.</p>
<p>In rendering its decsion the Court of Appeals noted:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The probable cause needed to conduct a DUI arrest requires that the officer have knowledge or reasoanably trustworthy information that the suspect was actaully in physical control of a moving vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, <strong>to a degree which renders him incapable of driving safely. </strong>(This is analogous to Washington DUI standard of &#8220;affected to an appreciable degree.)</p>
<p>As has been found in Washington DUI cases, when the evidence shows only consumption, but not impairment, this is insufficent to support an arrest for DUI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseadvocate.com/speeding-riding-the-fog-line-odor-of-alcohol-and-dui-eyes-do-not-add-up-to-probable-cause-to-arrest/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Chicago officer accused of falsifying DUI reports</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseadvocate.com/false-dui-reports</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseadvocate.com/false-dui-reports#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Lawrence, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseadvocate.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illinois State&#8217;s Attorney&#8217;s Office is invetigating Chicago Officer Richard Fiorito for drumming up false DUI charges.  A federal lawsuit was filed against Fiorito by 21 people that allege they were roughed up and called anti-gay slurs by the Chicago police officer.  As many as 20 more indivudals are expected to join the suit. A video released Tuesday appears to show Fiorito bullying a DUI suspect during a June [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Illinois State&#8217;s Attorney&#8217;s Office is invetigating Chicago Officer Richard Fiorito for drumming up false DUI charges. </p>
<p>A federal lawsuit was filed against Fiorito by 21 people that allege they were roughed up and called anti-gay slurs by the Chicago police officer.  As many as 20 more indivudals are expected to join the suit.</p>
<p>A video released Tuesday appears to show Fiorito bullying a DUI suspect during a June arrest.  There are a number of problems with the way the field sobriety test were conducted.  Despite the officer&#8217;s inability to conduct the tests correctly the driver seems to do fine.  Despite his performance he is arrested for DUI. </p>
<p>A second video does not appear to support Fiorito&#8217;s allegations that the driver was swerving from lane to lane and narrowly missing parked cars. </p>
<p>On Novmeber 12, 2009, NBC Chicago reported:</p>
<blockquote>
<p id="paragraph11">Fiorito has been honored by Mothers Against Drunk Driving for the 313 DUI arrests he made between Jan. 1, 2007 and June 6, 2008.</p>
<p id="paragraph12">He said that if he&#8217;s called to testify in these cases, he will assert his 5th Amendment rights.</p>
<p id="paragraph13">Fiorito is the third Chicago cop accused of trumping up DUI charges. Last year, prosecutors dropped more than 50 cases after accusing Chicago officer John Haleas of perjury. Earlier this year, dozens of DUI arrests by officer Joe Parker came under scrutiny.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I previously practiced in a jurisdiction where all police vehicles were equipped with cameras.  The videos above demonstrate why they should be mandatory in every jurisdiciton.  Not only do offer unbiased evidence, they can be used to deter (or at least catch) police misconduct. </p>
<p>As the push to arrest more and more DUI driver&#8217;s continues, these type of incidents will become more prevelant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseadvocate.com/false-dui-reports/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
